SYSTEMS ANALYSIS OF THE ZOHAR

 

According to Fritjof Capra, Claude Bernard (1813-1878), who pioneered modern experimental medicine, insisted that there was an intimate relationship between any organism and its environment, an idea that is simply taken for granted today.  Bernard talked about each organism’s internal environment, in which the organs and tissues exist, and he believed that in a healthy organism the internal environment remains constant, even in the face of large fluctuations in the external environment.  To take this idea into the Zohar leads us to ask whether the Zohar might be an organism and then to ask about its internal environment.

 

An organism is in modern terms an organized system that exhibits properties of life, the chief of those properties being an ability to respond to stimuli.  In a highly enlightened individual, the spiritual/psychological internal environment is one of serenity in the face of stresses that would destabilize an ordinary person.  The Zohar is at the very least a powerful force for stabilization and serenity in the human.  But could the Zohar itself BE an organism?  It can be said that highly evolved systems of thought have a life of their own that seems to transcend the century they are delivered in and the language in which they were developed.  But the Zohar has another characteristic that it shares with some of the other sacred texts of the world: it was not just written by a human being, although it was written down by a human being. 

 

The Bible, the Koran, the Zohar and other scriptures were in an exact sense dictated to those humans who were able to open themselves to divine inspiration.  The Zohar flowed through the human mind, and its overall structure and content pre-existed the person or people who transcribed it onto those first scrolls.  The supernal Zohar still exists in that higher realm where it is still accessible to a very few people who have even in this century that same ability to open to extrasensory transmissions.  And it is in this sense that it is and always has been an organism, because it responds to each of those seekers differently, based on their own abilities, understandings, needs, and levels of spiritual development.  Its internal environment is one of a highly organized flow of understanding moving around a pivotal core of faith and dedication to God.  As much as the external environment changes, both in terms of the types of humans accessing its wisdom and in terms of the divine plan that is ever-evolving, that internal environment of the Zohar remains constant in its nature and purpose.

 

You will need at the very least to hold in your mind the possibility that the Zohar was dictated by spiritual forces, even if you reserve judgment on the truth or falsity of this position, because unless you do this you will not be able to understand or appreciate some of what we are telling you.  There are scholars in the thousands who will say based on all kinds of textual evidence that the Zohar was written in the 13th century, and there are mystics who will say based on their own direct experience that it was never written at all — it was written down, which is an entirely different thing.  If you can at least take a neutral position on this issue it will allow you more easily to evaluate some of what we are going to say.  The authors are of course, we must admit to this, prejudiced in favor of the mystics because we have had those experiences, and there is absolutely no substitute for direct experience.  On the other hand, we also know that people only believe what they have experienced themselves or at least what is common in the world around them, and this is not common nor widely known.  We also employ skeptical inquiry as do you, and such inquiry only fails when personal experience is so overwhelming and proven in so many different ways that it no longer becomes a viable mode of operation.  This is why we ask for your indulgence as you think about what we are saying.

 

One of the most powerful models of the twentieth century that emerged almost simultaneously from the fields of chemistry, particle physics and biology was the concept of dissipative structures.  These can best be explained as highly organized structures that arise as a result of extreme disequilibrium in a system.  There are examples in the test tube, in flora and fauna, in laser light technology, in weather patterns, and so on.  The perfect spiral that flows down the bath drain is a dissipative structure that succeeds the earlier turbulence of the escaping water when the plug was first drawn.  Another example is what happens when an extremely thin layer of liquid is evenly and slowly heated; the random movement of the liquid is suddenly replaced by a pattern that looks much like a perfect honeycomb.  In Megabrain (p.57), Michael Hutchison writes: “Dissipative structures... are largely formed by the energy and matter flowing through them, just as our bodies are not simply preexistent structures that pass energy and matter through them in the form of food, water, oxygen and so on — they literally are the energy and matter that flow through them.  Dissipative structures... are flow.”  In this context scientists also talk about emergent properties, which are those properties that emerge at a certain level of complexity but do not exist at lower levels.  A good example is the fact that the taste of sugar is nowhere present in the carbon, hydrogen and oxygen atoms that sugar consists of; the whole is greater and different than the sum of its parts.  The underlying chaos in many systems under stress requires only a critical influx of that stress in order to accelerate the disequilibrium to a point where, miraculously, a much higher order of organization is suddenly generated.  The Zohar exhibits this pattern quite clearly.  In its seemingly chaotic mixture and flow of trains of thought that can’t be comprehended, gematria (or sacred numerical values of Hebrew letters and words), letters circling through the air, rearrangement of the letters in the Names of God, the shift and flow of the Sefirot, incomprehensible explanations for supernal events, and so on, there are the seeds of a profound and probably unprecedented pattern of higher understanding.

 

 Claude Bernard, mentioned earlier, said “It is what we think we know already that prevents us from learning”.  This has direct application to the Zohar, because the intensive study of the text results first in a profound emptying of the mind that is very conducive to the reception of new material.  There comes a point where one is certain only that one knows nothing about the Zohar — nothing about its content, its message, its purpose, its structure, its arguments.  Nothing.  As in Zen, this is an extremely valuable point to reach; it is in fact a prerequisite for learning what the Zohar has to teach.  And it is of course the Zohar itself which is the stressor, the factor which pushes the mind that seeks to understand it to such a point that the mind is finally transformed into something quite different than it had been, and into a new and much higher state of organization.

 

The organization of the Zohar shows that it is a system; it is organically connected in each of its parts to the human psyche itself.  The system which it incorporates is one which has three characteristics: relationship, flow and context; each of these characteristics has deep significance in any understanding of how the Zohar works.

 

Perhaps the most important thing that the Zohar demands of the mind that engages it is the simultaneous use of left and right brain functioning, or in simpler terms the ability to use logic AND intuition at exactly the same time and for extended periods of time.  This is no easy feat.  Generally speaking it requires quite a different mood for a person to be able to write poetry than to be able to study a chemistry text or do an income tax return.  At the very least a short period of time is required to make the shift from one mindset to the other.  The Zohar will not allow you that time.  During the process of editing the Zohar, this author found that synopsizing the dense and sometimes almost impenetrable text demanded intellectual understanding together with intuition at all times.  After some months it was possible to make the shift from left to right brain processing almost instantaneously.  Either a much greater balance between the hemispheres was achieved, OR ELSE new connections or pathways between the two hemispheres were formed. 

 

It was also noted that a lifelong habit of orderliness in paperwork became replaced by a much more casual and seemingly disorganized desktop, and yet without losing the ability to track outstanding work and issues.

 

In short, there is no question that the immersion in the Zohar made fundamental changes in the way the mind processed information.  This could easily be seen as one outcome of an engagement with a system that resulted in a dissipative structure of the mind.

 


Let’s take a look at the Mandate of the Zohar, which I have arbitrarily divided into nine parts:

 

1.        to establish a foundation for right thinking;

2.       to increase understanding of balance and flow;

3.       to remind people of the role of divinity in the patterning of the world;

4.       to establish rules for social justice;

5.       to form a framework of societal norms that are in keeping with a clear knowledge of divine force and intervention;

6.       to foster strong relationships between those of the oligarchy, those dedicated to spiritual growth and those who have incarnated to raise their levels of closeness to God;

7.       to free expression from the purely material manipulations of world leaders who are dedicated only to their own advancement, in other words, to engender freedom of speech;

8.       to inform the spirit with suitable objects of contemplation; and

9.       to foster relationships between the divine and the human in order to give humans access to higher wisdom and knowledge, higher powers and higher beauty.

 

Any entity, project or system developed with a mandate must have done so in response to some perceived need, and the needs that the Zohar fulfills, or at least that it fulfilled in the earlier centuries of its existence on earth, were the needs for Structure and Connection.

 

People needed structure so that they could know their own place within their world, so that they could live in a secure society, so that they could have good governance and justice, so that they could know what to expect from their lives given their roles and positions at birth, and also so that they could understand the place that heaven, earth and Gehenom played during and after their lives.  This also included the need to understand how Jerusalem above and Zion below, the Garden of Eden above and below, and the structural integrity of the Sefirot and columns related to their own existence and purpose.

 

The appearance of the Zohar also spoke to the need for connection: peoples’ connections with the divine, with their families, friends, tribe and coworkers, with others in their town and their nation, with others in the world at large and in the greater universe.  It also gave them some understanding of the connection between their lives in their own time and those who lived in their past or their future — and it connected them to those spirits who live in no-time.